OSHA 1910.95 Non-Compliance Cost Estimator

Find out what hearing conservation non-compliance could actually cost your facility — using OSHA’s real penalty methodology, not inflated marketing numbers.

OSHA 2025 Penalty Schedule FOM Chapter 6 Methodology NIOSH/CDC Published Data
1 Employees
2 Exposed
3 HCP Status
4 Testing
5 Industry
Determines OSHA size-based penalty reductions (FOM Table 6-2)
Number of workers in your hearing conservation program (or who should be)
25
150100200500+
Affects the number and type of violations OSHA would cite
Critical: Missing annual audiograms trigger per-employee IBI citations since April 2024
Helps us tailor noise exposure context to your environment

Your Estimated Non-Compliance Cost

Conservative Estimate
$0$0
New Policy — April 2024

Instance-by-Instance (IBI) Citation Policy

OSHA expanded its per-employee citation policy to include 1910.95(g)(6) — annual audiometric testing. Each worker without a current annual audiogram can now be cited as a separate violation at full gravity-based penalty.

Source: OSHA Memo, April 17, 2024

Per-Employee IBI Penalty Exposure
If OSHA applies Instance-by-Instance citations for missing annual audiograms
$0$0
Total Annual Non-Compliance Exposure
Penalties + Workers’ Comp liability + HCP program costs + productivity impact
$0$0
Sources: OSHA 2025 Penalty Schedule, OSHA IBI Memo April 2024, NIOSH/CDC WC Data (2023), Peer-reviewed HCP cost study
Cost ComponentEstimated RangeSource
Disclaimer: This estimator provides ranges based on published OSHA penalty schedules, FOM Chapter 6 methodology, and federal health/safety research data. Actual OSHA penalties vary based on specific inspection findings, Area Director discretion, employer cooperation, and abatement timelines. This tool is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice.

OSHA 2025 PenaltiesFOM Chapter 6IBI Memo (April 2024)NIOSH/CDC Workers' Comp Data