eBook Chapter 8 min read Chapter 3 of 12

The 10 Key Roles in Your Occupational Hearing Conservation Program

The 10 Key Roles in Your Occupational Hearing Conservation Program
Share
LinkedIn X

If you are new to hearing conservation, or your workplace has recently been assessed for noise and is now at or above the OSHA action level of 85 dB(A) time-weighted average (TWA) over an 8-hour day, you may be wondering who you need to engage to help build your Hearing Conservation Program (HCP). While there are many roles to fill, several can be held by only a few people, and thankfully, not all are mandatory. As your business grows, you may want to hire people with more specialized skill sets to help your program run smoothly.

The following are the 10 key roles you may find in a Hearing Conservation Program:

The Program Manager

This person is often an EHS (Environmental Health and Safety) manager who may run several programs, of which the Hearing Conservation Program (HCP) is only one. They will be responsible for overseeing the program, ensuring testing is completed on time, tracking compliance, monitoring the effectiveness of hearing protection, and record-keeping (noise measurements, noise controls, and maintenance of the OSHA 300 Log). They may also be in charge of scheduling and the audiometric testing itself. In cases where a Standard Threshold Shift (STS) has been identified, they are responsible for notifying the employee, reviewing the employee’s workspace for physical noise mitigations, fitting of HPDs (Hearing Protection Devices), and additional training on proper use of HPDs both on and off the job.

Role of Employees in an Occupational Hearing Testing Program

In the context of an HCP, this includes anyone who is exposed to noise (85 dB(A) time-weighted average or more) at work. Once they are exposed, you must make at least two different types of hearing protection available for these employees, and they must be included in the monitoring program. If the employees are exposed to 90 dB(A) TWA, hearing protection for these employees is mandatory. Employees can play a major part in your program compliance. When employees are engaged in the program and understand the benefits of wearing hearing protection both on and off the job, your injuries will be reduced, and less time and money will be spent on evaluations and worker’s compensation.

Environmental Health & Safety Managers

Regional EHS Managers have similar roles to the Hearing Conservation Manager (HCM) but on a local or site level. Commonly these are Board-Certified Safety Professionals (CSPs), who are often responsible for maintaining the OSHA 300 Logs for the locations they oversee. They may also assist with hearing testing, scheduling, fitting and insertion of HPDs, and are often the people facilitating the annual hearing conservation training.

Occupational Hearing Conservationists and Qualified Test Examiners

The Council for Accreditation in Occupational Hearing Conservation (CAOHC)1 provides training across the US and abroad to become certified in hearing testing for occupational programs. This training is mandated in some states and considered best practice for all those involved in audiometric testing. When testing using an automated method such as SHOEBOX PureTest, additional training is provided by the manufacturer to gain expertise in the use of their technology.

Occupational Health Nurses

If your organization has Occupational Health Nurses, they can be very useful members of the team who may serve a similar role to the Regional EHS Manager. They may be responsible for conducting the hearing testing, record-keeping, and training. Nurses are trained in otoscopy (looking in employee’s ears); therefore, they can check for things such as wax impaction or ear anomalies. Nurses are typically only found in larger organizations that have an on-site clinic and may have access to sound booths to perform testing.

Industrial Hygienists

Industrial Hygienists (IH) maintain workplace health and safety by identifying, evaluating, and controlling exposure to various chemical, physical, ergonomic, and biological hazards. Their responsibilities vary depending on the industry, workplace, and the types of hazards affecting employees; however, their goals are often the same: to implement control measures that will reduce the incidences of sickness or injury and identify potential health threats in the workplace. The IH has a particular expertise in noise monitoring. They are trained in the use of sound level meters for noise surveys and the creation of noise maps. These are the average sound levels (time-weighted over an 8-hour period) mapped across a physical workspace on a grid and help identify which workers are at risk of noise exposure. They would also be responsible for tracking and determining the Personal Exposure Levels (PELs) of workers through dosimetry and, ultimately, for helping determine who qualifies for inclusion into the hearing conservation program.

Professional Supervisors

The 1983 OSHA’s Hearing Conservation Amendment first emphasized the role of a hearing healthcare professional in the audiometric testing components of 29 CFR 1910.95 (g). For example: “A technician who performs audiometric tests must be responsible to an audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician.’’ Similar rules exist in the MSHA Noise Regulation (30 CFR Part 62). The Professional Supervisor (PS) “has responsibility for ensuring the adequacy of the audio-metric testing environment, procedures, and record-keeping; the training of audiometric technicians; as well as the coordination of audiometric services delivered by a third-party healthcare provider”2. The Professional Supervisor could also be the healthcare professional who reviews the employee audiograms, but this is not always the case. For example, a company that has locations in several different states would typically only have one Professional Supervisor but could have multiple audiogram reviewers, as those individuals need to be licensed in the state in which the employee is stationed. Professional Supervision responsibilities include:

  • Ensuring that baselines are appropriately set and modified
  • Ensuring all testing equipment, as well as the testing environment(s), meet regulatory compliance guidelines
  • Ensuring proper testing protocols, including annual testing, retests, and confirming appropriate paths of referrals
  • Reviewing the annual hearing conservation training content provided to employees
  • Ensuring that there are a minimum of two types of hearing protection options for employees
  • Investigating trends in hearing shifts
  • Overseeing the training of the hearing test administrators, including how the results are shared with the employee

Audiological Reviewers

The review of audiograms is required under 1910.95(g)(7) (iii) and states that ‘‘The audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician shall review problem audiograms and shall determine whether there is a need for further evaluation.’’ Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the results for a particular employee are valid and complete and whether or not there is a shift in hearing from previous evaluations. They would record their clinical impressions as well as recommendations for the next actions, which could include requesting a retest, notifying the employee of a change in hearing, modifying baselines, and/or recommending a medical or audiological referral. More on the role of the Professional Supervisor and Audiological Reviewers is available in Chapter 7 (Establishing an OSHA-Compliant Occupational Hearing Testing Program).

Safety Specialist or Engineer

A Safety Engineer spends a lot of time at worksites to ensure proper implementation and monitoring of safety factors. When aiding a Hearing Conservation Program, their role would be to implement engineering controls to prevent unnecessary noise exposure. These controls can reduce sound exposure levels for most noise sources. They can involve altering equipment (i.e. converting a mechanical component to an electronic one), replacing old machinery, and making physical barriers at the noise source to block the transmission path and reduce the noise level at the worker’s ear. This type of prevention is preferred over administrative controls, such as reducing the time an employee is exposed during their shift or using different personal protective equipment (PPEs). By combining a knowledge of health and safety with systems engineering, they are able to ensure that equipment, machinery, chemicals, and other environmental factors are safe. This is not a mandatory role but can be very helpful to the Health and Safety Team in administering the HCP. Often the Hearing Conservation Program Manager would take on these tasks if a Safety Engineer was not on staff.

Acoustical Engineer

An Acoustical Engineer is an engineer who specializes in the science of sound and vibration. Their primary role is the control of noise or vibration that can be harmful to employees and the general public. They are commonly found in the industrial, manufacturing, architecture, and transportation sectors, all those which benefit from expertise in acoustical engineering. Within an HCP, the Acoustical Engineer would be responsible for the diagnoses of noise problems in a noisy environment. They are looking for the dominant sound sources as well as the solutions that make it possible to reduce the noise. Acoustic diagnostics in noisy environments require, in addition to the traditional sound level meter, more specialized tools such as sound intensity probes, sound mapping, and beamforming antenna (a signal processing technique).

This guide is intended to be a useful tool on your journey to in-house mobile hearing testing or adding iPad-based testing to your services business. We’ll be releasing a new chapter each week for the next 10 weeks! However, if you would like to download the complete guide now, complete the form below.

Feel free to share this with colleagues, peers, or others who would benefit from learning more about how to optimize your Hearing Conservation Program with innovative employee-focused testing and follow-up.

References:

1 Hearing Conservation Manual, Council for Accreditation in Occupational Hearing Conservation, 5th Edition (2017)

2 The Role of the Professional Supervisor in the Audiometric Testing Component of Hearing Conservation Programs. ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 60(9):502-506, September 2018.

Found this useful? Share it.
LinkedIn X

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main options for delivering audiometric testing, and how do they compare?

Employers have three primary approaches to audiometric testing delivery. Sending employees to external clinics is practical for very small programs (fewer than 50 employees) but becomes operationally expensive as headcount grows — clinic fees, paid travel time, and potential overtime for shift coverage accumulate quickly, and scheduling depends entirely on clinic availability. Mobile van testing consolidates testing into one or two annual visits, which reduces per-visit coordination effort but creates scheduling compression: all program testing must occur in a narrow window, no-shows require individual rescheduling at additional cost, and results typically arrive weeks after testing. In-house testing distributes testing throughout the year using equipment on-site, eliminates travel and van scheduling dependencies, and provides direct access to results. The tradeoff is the upfront investment in equipment, training, and a compliant testing space — though that space does not require a sound booth if a quiet room is available. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX PureTest enables in-house audiometric testing without requiring a sound booth. Any reasonably quiet room that passes a room scan can serve as a test environment. This eliminates the scheduling dependency on mobile van availability and the no-show rescheduling problem that increases costs in trailer-based programs.

What is the baseline audiogram timeline, and why does the testing delivery model affect it?

OSHA requires a valid baseline audiogram within 6 months of an employee’s first exposure at or above the action level (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i)). If the employer uses a mobile test van, the deadline extends to 12 months — but the employee must wear hearing protectors from the 6-month mark until baseline testing is completed (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii)). The testing delivery model affects compliance directly: a program that relies on one annual van visit may not be able to obtain a new hire’s baseline within the 6-month window, making the HPD-wearing requirement active for that employee until the van returns. This gap creates both compliance risk and increased HPD cost. SHOEBOX: Because SHOEBOX is on-site and available whenever a quiet room is available, new employee baselines can be obtained within days of hire — not months. This closes the compliance gap created by trailer-based scheduling and eliminates the extended HPD-wearing requirement in most cases.

What scheduling approach works best for a continuous testing program?

Concentrating all testing into one or two van days per year creates significant operational friction: scheduling many employees in a compressed window, managing no-shows, backfilling production positions during testing, and paying overtime for shift coverage. Distributing testing throughout the year — using in-house equipment — converts that scheduling exercise into a steady, manageable workflow. Testing can be completed during breaks, shift starts, or low-production periods without disrupting operations. Employees miss fewer appointments when testing is available at their regular work location. Results are available immediately rather than arriving in a batch weeks after the van visit. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX’s scheduling rules in the Data Management Portal (PLUS tier) track due-for-testing status per employee against birth date or hire date, generating a Due-for-Testing report at any interval. This replaces the manual scheduling effort required to manage annual van programs.

What are the required professional roles in an OSHA-compliant Hearing Conservation Program?

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(3) requires that any technician who performs audiometric tests be responsible to an audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician. This creates two distinct roles: the Professional Supervisor and the Audiology Reviewer. Both are mandated; they can be fulfilled by the same individual or by different people, depending on the organization. The Professional Supervisor has program-level responsibility: ensuring that testing environments, procedures, and recordkeeping meet standards, and that technicians are appropriately trained. The Audiology Reviewer has patient-level responsibility: evaluating individual audiograms for clinical significance, confirming or ruling out STSs, and identifying problem audiograms requiring further evaluation. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX Audiological Services provides access to both roles: CAOHC-certified Professional Supervisors for program oversight and a network of state-licensed Audiology Reviewers for individual audiogram review. This allows organizations to run a compliant in-house program without maintaining these roles on staff.

What does an Audiology Reviewer actually do — and why can't automated software replace this function?

An Audiology Reviewer assesses individual employee audiograms for two things: changes in hearing from one test to the next, and “problem audiograms” — results that indicate a need for further evaluation beyond what STS mathematics can capture (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(7)(iii)). Problem audiograms can include: sudden drops in hearing at a single frequency (which may indicate non-noise pathology), significant asymmetry between ears, audiometric patterns inconsistent with noise-induced hearing loss, or results that suggest testing validity issues. Automated STS calculation identifies whether the numerical threshold for an STS has been met — it does not evaluate clinical context, audiogram shape, or whether the result is consistent with the employee’s occupational history. Professional review addresses the clinical layer that software cannot. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX’s Data Management Portal triages audiograms automatically based on configured rules (STS, problem audiogram flags, completeness), routing the relevant files to the SHOEBOX Audiology Review Network. Reviewers access and complete their reviews through the portal, and their recommendations are returned to the EHS manager in the same system — without file transfers or email chains.

Who else is typically part of an occupational hearing conservation team?

Beyond the Professional Supervisor and Audiology Reviewer, several roles contribute to a well-functioning Hearing Conservation Program. The Program Manager (often an EHS Director or Safety Manager) owns overall compliance: scheduling, training coordination, OSHA 300 Log maintenance, HPD management, and STS follow-up. Regional supervisors or floor managers ensure that employees attend testing and follow up on referrals. Human resources coordinates recordkeeping access and employment record integration. Industrial hygienists conduct noise surveys, build noise exposure maps, and establish personal exposure assessments that determine who enters the Hearing Conservation Program. Occupational health physicians or nurses may be involved in reviewing problem audiograms, work-relatedness determinations, and STS follow-up referrals. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX Audiological Services provides the Professional Supervisor and Audiology Reviewer roles as a managed service, reducing the internal staffing burden. The Data Management Portal gives each team member role-based access to the data relevant to their function.

Two ways to start. Both take 15 minutes.

See PureTest in action, or get pricing built for your program.