eBook Chapter 9 min read Chapter 8 of 12

Audiological Review as Part of a Hearing Conservation Program

Audiological Review as Part of a Hearing Conservation Program
Share
LinkedIn X

Vanessa Gauthier-Davidson, an In-house Audiologist at SHOEBOX Ltd, acts as a coordinator of the SHOEBOX Audiology Review Network; an international team of licensed Audiologists available to assist SHOEBOX customers meet their OSHA and MSHA compliance requirements. The Audiology Review Network offers businesses compliant access to regionally licensed Audiologist(s) for rapid review of their occupational hearing testing results. Vanessa has extensive experience and a keen understanding of the various roles. Audiologists play in a successful occupational hearing testing program. Here she shares her insights with us.

Can you explain two main professional roles in a Hearing Conservation Program?

The two main roles that are mandated by OSHA/MSHA are 1) Professional Supervisor and 2) Audiology Reviewer. These roles can be fulfilled by the same person or by different individuals. Various organizations and standards use interchangeable terms from ‘Supervising Audiologist or Physician’ to ‘responsible to an Audiologist or Physician’ to ‘Professional Supervisor.’ For our purposes here, we will combine these under the term ‘Professional Supervisor (PS).’

Notably, the Council for Accreditation in Hearing Conservation (CAOHC) provides a unique certification to Audiologists and Physicians to oversee Hearing Conservation Programs (HCPs): ‘Certified Professional Supervisor of the Audiometric Monitoring Program©.’ This certification is renewable every 5 years, and although not mandatory for an Audiologist or Occupational Health Physician to have when overseeing a program or perform reviews, it is considered best practice. CAOHC also offers the most up-to-date knowledge and materials for certification. Visit for more information on becoming a certified Professional Supervisor.

The PS is responsible for overseeing the clinical, training, and testing aspects of an HCP. They need to understand what type and intensity of noise the employees are exposed to, how the workplace noise is measured and monitored, the content of the annual hearing conservation training, as well as the hearing protection provided to workers. A PS can also fulfill the role of Audiology Reviewer for the same organization, or this role can be fulfilled by other qualified professionals.

Take, for example, a large organization with program participants across multiple states. To be in compliance with state-based audiology clinical regulations, Reviewers must be licensed in the states where they are providing review. Therefore, an organization that has HCP participants in 44 different states would require Reviewers licensed in each of those states. Many Audiologists working in hearing conservation hold licenses in several states. In contrast, individuals holding solely PS responsibilities can oversee a program that is active in multiple states without requiring licensure in all of those states. It would be counterintuitive to require multiple supervisors to oversee a single program to meet individual state licensing requirements. In this scenario, the PS provides direction and oversees the work of the state-licensed Audiology Reviewers across the entire HCP.

Audiology Reviewers must be either a licensed Audiologist or a Physician trained in the interpretation of audiograms. They are responsible for assessing audiograms for all employees in an organization’s HCP. As a clinician, the Reviewer is looking for changes in an employee’s hearing from one test to the next and also for ‘problem audiograms,’ which are results that may indicate the need for further testing. Note that this is an OSHA-mandated audiometric testing requirement on top of reviewing audiograms for noise-related hearing shifts. If further evaluation is needed, the Reviewer will recommend a medical or an audiological referral.

The Audiology Reviewer provides both clinical reviews and knowledge of hearing. They act as a hearing health advisor. While it may be relatively easy to read an audiogram, it’s harder to interpret one and provide appropriate follow-up recommendations. It’s not just about looking at the audiogram and its symbols; the individual responses on the annual pre-test questionnaire, as well as the historical audiograms and trends in results, are key in results interpretation. Several data sources are drawn upon for follow-up recommendations.

Reviewers use their clinical expertise to determine whether a change in hearing could be the result of a medical condition that may benefit from further investigation (e.g. a sudden drop in hearing, potential middle-ear involvement). They also evaluate results to ensure their validity, as some types and degrees of hearing loss should be evaluated manually by a hearing professional, in contrast to testing with a technician. Ultimately, HCPs are in place to prevent workplace hearing loss. And it is preventable! The Professional Supervisor and Audiology Reviewers play key roles as they are responsible for probing into and understanding the reasons why a shift in hearing may have occurred and subsequently making impactful recommendations.

What qualifications or certifications does an Audiology Reviewer require?

If your Reviewer is an Audiologist, they will have a Doctoral or Masters degree in Audiology as well as active state-based licensure. Rules and regulations vary by state/region; therefore, knowledge of those as they pertain to occupational hearing testing would be key. If your Reviewer is a Physician, he or she will be an M.D. or D.O. with experience in occupational medicine.

Although your Audiology Reviewer doesn’t require CAOHC certification, the knowledge provided by this additional training can be of significant benefit to the audiogram assessments and follow-up recommendations. The In-House Audiology Team at SHOEBOX is CAOHC certified as Professional Supervisors.

How is the relationship between Employer and Reviewer established and maintained?

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(3) states that “A technician who performs audiometric tests must be responsible to an audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician.”

For companies that outsource their testing to a service provider, that provider usually establishes the connection to the Audiologist or Physician for review and referral. For companies that manage their own testing, they should establish a relationship with a regional Audiologist to provide reviewer and supervision services.

SHOEBOX PureTest customers have access to an international network of licensed Audiologists. These companies use automated testing equipment to run the hearing testing and contract Audiology Review services. Many SHOEBOX occupational health customers also contract review services from the SHOEBOX network of Reviewers. Quality audiogram reviews are provided in a timely and clear fashion via the SHOEBOX individualized web portal. The final step of the clinical workflow for an HCP is that appropriate paths of referrals for both medical and audiological follow-up should be established for each company location.

What process does a Reviewer typically follow to provide their services?

Historically, an employer would send paper audiograms to an Audiology Reviewer with whom they had an established business relationship. The Reviewer then assessed each employee record and provided written recommendations back to their client. This was a lengthy and arduous process that can now be streamlined significantly thanks to technology and innovative new products.

With SHOEBOX PureTest, Reviewers leverage our web portal to perform their reviews and provide feedback. The Reviewers access the hearing health records of the clients in the states they are assigned. The web portal triaging review system intelligently compares the most recent test against an employee’s baseline to know if a shift has occurred and/or if additional review is indicated.

The portal is also the mechanism used for communicating recommendations to the employer, including follow-up actions. When a Reviewer recommends that an employer look at a specific employee file in the portal, we simply change a flag status to “follow-up.” The employer is responsible to log into the web portal and action the Reviewer’s recommendations.

As this is all accomplished digitally, communication is streamlined and easy to access. Tracking of actions is also chronicled, which is especially helpful retrospectively. The steps that remain to be completed are clearly indicated, as well as what has already been actioned. All of this makes complying with OSHA reporting requirements easier and more efficient.

The concept of the SHOEBOX Audiology Reviewer Network is different from how most reviews are done. What are the advantages of using this network?

With the Reviewer Network, we can offer reviews across the United States and Canada. It can be challenging to find a local Reviewer in every state/region where an organization may have facilities. The Review Network removes that burden from the employer and enables a company to offer full hearing conservation services in-house.

With SHOEBOX mobile audiometry, a company can save time and money by conducting tests and retests in-house, and the Reviewer – who is remote but available digitally – can access and analyze the audiograms in real-time. Easy access to the web portal helps the Network to provide swift results turnaround time, with live updates. Furthermore, this real-time progression makes it hassle-free for the reviewer and company to communicate recommended follow-up actions easily.

What happens if a hearing shift is likely not related to noise exposure in the workplace?

When a shift in hearing has been identified by an employee’s annual hearing test, many employers want to know if that hearing loss is potentially due to noise in the workplace or from something else. The employer will want to know if there are factors in the employee’s activities outside of work that may be the main cause of the shift in hearing. During the review process, the Audiology Reviewer will take all factors into consideration and should a cause other than exposure to high levels of noise in the workplace likely be the sole cause of the shift, a recommendation will be made by the Reviewer not to include that shift on the OSHA reporting Log. Often, in this case, a medical or audiological referral is recommended to investigate the cause of the hearing loss further.

In summary, the roles Audiologists and Physicians play in hearing testing results and recommendations, as well as in overall Hearing Conservation Program supervision, are vital to OSHA compliance and the success of the program. SHOEBOX PureTest and the SHOEBOX Audiology Review Network are uniquely positioned to help with these important elements of your program.

This guide is intended to be a useful tool on your journey to in-house mobile hearing testing or adding iPad-based testing to your services business. We’ll be releasing a new chapter each week for the next 5 weeks! However, if you would like to download the complete guide now, complete the form below.

Feel free to share this with colleagues, peers, or others who would benefit from learning more about how to optimize your Hearing Conservation Program with innovative employee-focused testing and follow-up.

Found this useful? Share it.
LinkedIn X

Frequently Asked Questions

What are OSHA's three levels of audiometer calibration and how do they differ?

OSHA’s audiometer calibration framework operates at three levels. Daily functional check (29 CFR 1910.95(h)(5)(i)): performed before each testing day using a person with known stable hearing thresholds to confirm clean tone output without distortion or interruption. If any frequency shows a 10 dB or greater deviation from the listener’s known threshold, acoustic calibration is required before testing continues. Annual acoustic calibration (29 CFR 1910.95(h)(5)(ii)): a calibrated measurement of the audiometer’s output using laboratory instruments per Appendix E. If any frequency deviates 15 dB or more from ANSI standards, an exhaustive calibration is required. Exhaustive calibration (29 CFR 1910.95(h)(5)(iii)): a comprehensive recalibration of all audiometer parameters per ANSI S3.6, required at minimum every 2 years. This is the most rigorous level and typically requires specialized equipment. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX’s annual calibration service performs acoustic calibration at every service interval. The advance-replacement model means no testing downtime between calibration cycles — the replacement transducer arrives calibrated and ready before the existing one is returned.

What qualifies as a biological verification, and who should perform it?

Biological verification is the daily functional check required by OSHA before each day of testing. The purpose is to detect significant drift in the audiometer’s sound output since the last annual calibration — not to evaluate the examiner’s hearing health. The check involves running a full audiogram on an individual with known stable hearing thresholds and comparing those results against that individual’s personal baseline. A deviation of 10 dB or more at any frequency indicates that the audiometer’s output has drifted and requires acoustic calibration. Any person with stable hearing thresholds can perform this function — the examiner does not need to have audiometrically normal hearing, only hearing that is stable and consistently documented. Individuals with hearing loss qualify if their thresholds are stable and their baseline is accurately recorded in the system. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX PureTest’s daily calibration workflow guides the examiner through the biological verification step before testing begins, and logs the result as part of the session’s compliance documentation.

What criteria should an EHS Director use when evaluating audiometric testing technology?

Five categories matter. Compliance integrity: does the system meet ANSI S3.6, OSHA 1910.95, and MSHA requirements? Is it an FDA-listed medical device? Does it perform all required frequencies per ear? Does STS detection follow OSHA methodology precisely? Does it support boothless testing with documented ambient noise monitoring? Workflow integration: does the system fit how testing actually occurs at your facilities — shift patterns, location access, employee throughput needs? Data management: where do records go? Who controls access? Can historical audiograms be imported? Can results be exported for regulatory reporting? Professional oversight: does the system support the Professional Supervisor and Audiology Reviewer workflow, or require managing that separately? Total program cost: equipment, calibration, professional services, data management, and technician time — compared against what you currently pay per test. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX PureTest addresses all five evaluation categories — ANSI S3.6 and FDA-listed compliance, on-site workflow integration, cloud-based data management with import and export, built-in Professional Supervisor and Audiology Reviewer support through SHOEBOX Audiological Services, and a predictable per-unit subscription cost model.

How long must audiometric records be retained, and what happens to them when an employee leaves?

OSHA requires that all employee audiometric test records be retained for the duration of that employee’s employment (29 CFR 1910.95(m)(3)(ii)). This requirement applies regardless of whether the employee leaves voluntarily, is terminated, or retires. Noise exposure measurement records carry a shorter retention period: 2 years from the date of measurement (29 CFR 1910.95(m)(3)(i)). Three operational implications follow. First, records must be accessible — not just stored. OSHA requires that audiometric records be made available to employees, former employees, designated representatives, and OSHA upon request (29 CFR 1910.95(m)(4)). Records that cannot be produced promptly on request do not meet this requirement regardless of where they are stored. Second, if a business closes or is acquired, audiometric records must be transferred to the successor employer, or if there is none, employees and NIOSH must be notified before disposal (29 CFR 1910.95(m)(5)). Third, the audiometric record is not just a test result — it must include the employee’s name and job classification, the test date, the examiner’s name, the date of the most recent acoustic calibration, the employee’s most recent noise exposure assessment, and the background sound pressure levels in the test room at the time of testing (29 CFR 1910.95(m)(2)(ii)). SHOEBOX: The SHOEBOX Data Management Portal stores the complete required record set — audiogram results, examiner identity, calibration dates, and ambient noise measurements — with automatic backup from the iPad. Records are accessible on demand without submitting a request to an external vendor, and they remain in the portal regardless of changes to the organization’s equipment or service provider.

What triggers the need for an audiogram to be sent to an Audiology Reviewer?

Two conditions generate mandatory review under OSHA. First, any audiogram in which a standard threshold shift has been identified must be reviewed by an audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician, who determines whether the shift requires further evaluation (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(7)(iii)). Second, “problem audiograms” — those that suggest pathology, testing validity concerns, or clinical findings beyond what STS criteria capture — require professional evaluation. Problem audiograms may show: sudden drops at a single frequency, significant asymmetry between ears, audiometric configurations inconsistent with noise exposure patterns, or results that suggest the test was not completed under valid conditions. OSHA does not define “problem audiogram” with a numerical standard; the determination is a clinical judgment that requires a professional reviewer, not a software rule. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX’s automatic triage system routes audiograms that meet configured criteria (STS detected, problem audiogram flags, incomplete results) directly to the Audiology Review Network queue in the portal — without requiring the EHS Manager to manually identify and forward files.

What does an Audiology Reviewer consider when deciding whether to revise a baseline audiogram?

Baseline revision is indicated under two circumstances per OSHA: when an STS is deemed persistent (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(9)(i)) and when the annual audiogram shows significant improvement over the established baseline (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(9)(ii)). In practice, reviewers also consider: whether the current audiogram represents the employee’s true hearing status versus a transient shift; whether prior baseline errors (such as a baseline recorded during a TTS) should be corrected; and whether the pattern of results across multiple years is consistent. The decision to revise a baseline audiogram must be made by a qualified professional — it is a clinical determination, not an automatic rule. An incorrect baseline revision can suppress future STS detection for years.

What are the most common drivers for transitioning from a mobile van service to in-house testing?

Four operational patterns consistently drive the decision. Scheduling compression: concentrating all program testing into one or two van days per year creates a high-stakes logistics exercise where a portion of employees typically miss their appointment, each requiring individual rescheduling. Delayed access to results: results arrive weeks after the van visit in a batch report, which compresses timelines for STS notification, retest scheduling, and follow-up actions. Baseline timeline gaps: new hires cannot be baselined until the next van visit, often months after first noise exposure, triggering the HPD-wearing requirement during that gap. Per-test cost: mobile testing fees increase predictably with headcount and typically include travel, technician time, and data management charges that compound at scale. When organizations evaluate these costs alongside the operational control and direct data access that in-house testing provides, the transition often shows a clear financial and compliance case. SHOEBOX: When organizations bring testing in-house with SHOEBOX, commonly reported outcomes include reduced per-test costs, improved retest completion rates, new-hire baselines obtained within days of hire, and consistent protocol enforcement across all test examiners.

How should we handle audiometric records from our previous service provider when transitioning to SHOEBOX?

Historical record quality varies significantly by source. Paper audiograms from clinic visits, CSV exports from legacy audiometric software, and data from previous service provider platforms all require different handling. The first priority is establishing accurate baselines in the new system: many transition complications arise from importing incorrect or outdated baselines, which causes STS determinations to be made against the wrong reference point. SHOEBOX Customer Success provides data import services to facilitate migration, including baseline verification and mapping from common legacy formats. Before importing, it is worth reviewing whether the historical baselines on file are actually the best baselines for each employee — in some cases, a fresh baseline under controlled conditions is preferable to importing a suspect historical record.

What are the compliance and operational advantages of iPad-based audiometry for service providers managing multi-client programs?

Service providers running audiometric testing across multiple employer clients face a consistency problem that traditional equipment creates: different sites, different technicians, different ambient conditions, and different testing schedules produce protocol variation that affects data quality. iPad-based audiometry addresses this structurally. Pre-configured test settings — locked by the administrator — ensure the same protocol is applied across every client, every site, every technician. The REACT™ Safeguards system monitors ambient noise and response validity throughout each session, flagging conditions that could compromise results rather than leaving those assessments to individual examiner judgment. Centralized data management across all client programs provides a single point of access for scheduling, reporting, and billing — without managing data in multiple formats from multiple sites. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX PureTest provides this consistency layer for service providers. Administrator-locked test configurations, REACT Safeguards, and the centralized Data Management Portal are the specific features that address protocol variation across multi-client programs.

What are the technician qualification requirements for service providers administering audiometric tests?

Under 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(3), technicians performing audiometric tests must be responsible to an audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician — and must either hold CAOHC certification, have satisfactorily demonstrated competence, or be operating a microprocessor audiometer (for which the certification requirement does not apply). For service providers, the practical implication is that CAOHC certification remains the recognized industry credential, and clients often require it as an assurance of technician competence. The microprocessor exception allows service providers to deploy non-CAOHC technicians with SHOEBOX, but program-level Professional Supervisor oversight is still required regardless. Service providers should document the supervisory relationship clearly in their client program agreements.

What is the complete step-by-step workflow for an OSHA-compliant testing day?

A compliant testing day follows nine sequential steps. Step 1 — Daily calibration: headphones check, room scan, and biological verification must be completed before any employee testing begins; OSHA requires the functional check before each day’s use (29 CFR 1910.95(h)(5)(i)). Step 2 — Room scan confirmation: the room scan result must be documented before testing starts; if the room fails, testing cannot proceed in that location. Step 3 — Employee intake: confirm employee identity, retrieve demographic data, verify noise exposure assessment and baseline status. Step 4 — Pre-test instruction: orient the employee to the test interface and response method; ensure they understand the task before tones begin. Step 5 — Testing: run automated, assisted, or manual mode as appropriate; REACT™ Safeguards monitor ambient noise and response patterns throughout. Step 6 — Digital signature: both employee and examiner sign the audiogram record on-device. Step 7 — Result review: STS is calculated automatically; examiner confirms test is complete and valid. Step 8 — Triage: audiogram is reviewed against configured rules; STS or problem audiogram flags route the file to the appropriate next action. Step 9 — Sync: completed audiograms upload to the portal when connectivity is available. SHOEBOX: This nine-step workflow maps directly to the SHOEBOX PureTest testing flow. Steps 1–2 correspond to PureTest’s daily calibration and room scan sequence; Steps 3–7 run within the PureTest app on the iPad; Steps 8–9 are handled by the Data Management Portal’s triage and sync functions.

Why is the baseline audiogram the most important record in an employee's Hearing Conservation Program file?

The baseline audiogram is the reference against which every future STS determination is made. Every annual audiogram compares the employee’s current thresholds to their baseline at 2,000, 3,000, and 4,000 Hz. An inaccurate baseline — established while the employee had a temporary threshold shift from recent noise exposure, illness, or the wrong 14-hour quiet period — compresses or inflates the apparent shift in every subsequent comparison. A baseline established too high (during a TTS) understates future STS risk. A baseline established too low may trigger false STSs. OSHA requires a minimum 14-hour quiet period before baseline testing (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(iii)); hearing protectors may substitute for this requirement. The clinical integrity of the entire Hearing Conservation Program rests on the accuracy of the baseline. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX Data Management PLUS manages baseline assignment and revision per employee. The portal’s triage system automatically flags cases where a persistent STS may warrant baseline revision and routes them to an Audiology Reviewer for clinical determination.

When should a baseline audiogram be revised, and who makes that decision?

Baseline revision is indicated in two circumstances under OSHA (29 CFR 1910.95(g)(9)): when a threshold shift is determined to be persistent (it has not resolved after retest), and when a subsequent audiogram shows significant improvement over the established baseline. The decision to revise a baseline audiogram must be made by a qualified professional — an audiologist, otolaryngologist, or physician. It is not a software function. The operational implication: programs that lack access to a professional reviewer may be unable to revise baselines appropriately, which causes either persistent false STSs (if improvement goes unrecognized) or missed STSs (if a persistent shift becomes the new assumed baseline without formal revision).

How does the testing environment affect employee participation rates?

Employee participation in annual audiometric testing is affected by how the experience is structured. Traditional mobile van testing — employees waiting in line, testing in a small shared space, uncertain timing during shift changes — creates friction that contributes to no-shows and reluctant participation. Testing at the employee’s own workplace, on their schedule, in a familiar environment, removes most of that friction. The testing interface also matters: an interface that communicates clearly in the employee’s language, responds predictably, and takes a reasonable amount of time increases completion rates. Long tests, confusing instructions, or uncomfortable equipment reduce them. SHOEBOX: SHOEBOX PureTest’s interface — where the employee drags an on-screen disc to indicate heard or not-heard — is largely language-agnostic, making it accessible for multilingual workforces. The system supports English, French, and Spanish for examiner-facing content. Automated mode tests are typically completed in a few minutes per ear.

Two ways to start. Both take 15 minutes.

See PureTest in action, or get pricing built for your program.